Talk:Steve Wariner/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: User:ChrisTofu11961 (talk · contribs) 22:46, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

I was happy to help review an article pertaining to country music. There are not enough of us actually writing the articles.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   As stated previously, make sure that you are including an overview that makes sense for the article you are writing. Steve Wariner has had a long career and a short overview would not make sense to readers. It is important we provide the best snapshot of the article as we can. Thank you for fixing that per my sugestion. Another thing to be mindful of is run-on sentences. Be careful with making sentences too long as I noticed a lot of long sentences throughout the article. The meaning of the sentence got lost in its length. It is also better to use active voice rather than passive voice (subject of the sentence first). Just something to be mindful of as you continue to write.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   You did a great job here! I learned a lot about Steve Wariner in reading this article.