Talk:Stertinia gens

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Polyonymy makes a mess of everything

My attention was drawn to the entry for Lucius Stertinius C. f. Quintilianus Acilius Strabo Gaius Curiatius Maternus Clodius Nummus who is identified here as one of the consuls of 146. However, checking against List of Roman consuls, he lacks an entry for that year. Moreover, we happen to know all of the consuls of that year, & the names of none of them match Clodius Nummus. Not to say there was never a consul with Clodius Nummus' full name. If you look at the article for Gaius Clodius Nummus, consul in 114, you will find him tentatively identified with Lucius Stertinius C. f. Quintilianus Acilius Strabo Gaius Curiatius Maternus Clodius Nummus. (The polyonymous Clodius Nummus offers little further information for his flourit than that polyonymy was far more common in the 2nd century than any other period, thus encouraging us to date him to that century, or at the earliest that last quarter of the 1st century.) Obviously there is a problem here, apparently due to Martin Klonnek's authority, & I'd like to look at this explanation for dating Clodius Nummus here.

That's not to say a Lucius Stertinius Quintillianus Acilius Strabo wasn't consul in this year: the full name of Quintus Cornelius Proculus is Lucius Stertinius Quintillianus Acilius Strabo Quintus Cornelius Proculus. Could these two have been inadvertently confused? (I'll admit that it is often hard to keep Roman names distinct, not only due to polyonymy but the annoying habit of oldest sons having the identical name as their father. Note the full names of the emperors Vespasian & his oldest son Titus.) Olli Salomies identifies the consul of 146, Cornelius Proculus, as the adoptive son of the consul of 114, C. Clodius Nummus. We really can't be entirely sure of many identifications due to polyonymy, a practice which serves to hide relationships from modern historians, & raises issues of just how many families died out & which survived from Republican times into the second century & beyond. Until I understand Klonnek's reasoning, I'm inclined to follow Salomies. In any case, we have another person to add to this list. -- llywrch (talk) 23:15, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]