Talk:Sterling Management
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sterling Management article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Sterling Management/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
*In the process of stream-lining citations to in-line format. Could use an image or two at some point, potentially a logo with a fair use rationale spelled out on the image page. Smee 21:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC). |
Substituted at 18:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Scientology articles
- Mid-importance Scientology articles
- WikiProject Scientology articles
- Start-Class company articles
- Mid-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Start-Class California articles
- Unknown-importance California articles
- Start-Class Los Angeles articles
- Unknown-importance Los Angeles articles
- Los Angeles area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles