This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Pittsburgh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject University of PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject University of PittsburghUniversity of Pittsburgh articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
It is almost as if you would have to be here in Pittsburgh to understand the significance of this notable object...that is really not the reason to retain this article, but no one that I've ever discussed this topic with here has been nothing but amazed. Another discussion will help clarify this issue, I trust. Best Regards,
Hi Barbara (WVS), could the physical description of the sketchbook, that is presently in the lead, have its own section directly under the lead called "Description"?, plus the lead having a pithy sentence as to the sketchbook's significance? thanks, (ps. i could have been WP:BOLD but ....) Coolabahapple (talk) 23:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would say that this is a 'safe' thing to be bold enough about. I'll take a look after you are done to take a look at it - I trust you!!! Best Regards,