Talk:Stephen Elop/Archives/2017
This is an archive of past discussions about Stephen Elop. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Could someone please return the references about Elop listed on 'worst CEO' lists
I have edited this point at least twice in the past, with links. They disappear at some point - I believe that is by the publicist of Elop. Its a FACT that many who rate corporate CEO's for a living have rated Elop one of the worst when he was at Nokia, some called him the worst CEO in office at that time (and many not just in Finland were calling for him to be fired). There is no disagreement of the fact, that he was a total failure. He was not hired to run a bigger company. He was not promoted to be chairman. he did not even retire after two decades as CEO. He was removed from running Nokia in 2 years and 10 months - when the Chairman Siilasmaa had to step in to run Nokia until he had found Elop's replacement. At least previous the previous CEO could serve until his replacement was found (as was the other enormous failure CEO contemporary of Elop's Stev Ballmer at Microsoft). If Wiki doesn't show that Elop was FREQUENTLY listed on 'worst CEO' lists, we do not do the truth any justice. I don't want to keep coming back to re-research those links. Is it possible for someone to put those links back (my old edits, couple of years ago) and perhaps put some 'lock' on that part, so that his publicist can't come and delete that part again. Its truly relevant info about this man. He was a rotten ceo. He caused a highly profitable Fortune 100 sized company to post record losses, fire nearly half of its staff, lose its credit rating, burn the investors for 80% of their stock value, and drop Nokia out of the Fortune 500. He was a disaster. Now, I recognize I can't write that level of emotion into the wiki entry haha, but come on, those are published famous media like the financial TV channels who rate the worst CEOs and the big financial press, that I had in the links. THEIR opinion HAS to have enough inherent merit, that the item needs to be included. This was genuinely one of the worst CEOs who briefly ran a company (essentially ruining it). That HAS to be visible on Wiki. We can't have the reality colored by some sleazy publicist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomi T Ahonen (talk • contribs) 19:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- I agree that Elop's position on the "Worst CEO" lists would be worth mentioning if it can be reliably sourced, and I think an article or three from notable financial commentator(s) should work as source(s). I had a quick look through the history and the only citation I found that either supported or mentioned "worst CEO" was a blog post by one Tomi Ahonen. I've nothing against using a blog by a former Nokia exec, but something more obviously independent and notable would probably last longer on a contended page like this. Personally I used to think Nokia made the best 'phones, and I was one of many who commented on Groklaw et al. to decry Elop's behaviour at the time, but I'll leave the digging to someone else. Pastychomper (talk) 10:12, 4 August 2017 (UTC)