This article was nominated for deletion on 10 January 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn.
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
In withdrawing the nomination for deletion, Clarityfiend raised the question: Should this be renamed Mobley v. State?" I am therefore listing this here for discussion.
Oppose renaming. Like many death penalty cases, the legal cases concerning Stephen Mobley proceeded under a number of different titles. We shouldn't arbitrarily select one of them to discuss the case when people searching for the article might well not be using that title. For example, while Mobley's initial prosecution took place under the title "The State v Mobley", this prosecution was halted due to a mistrial. A second prosecution then took place under the title, "The State v Stephen A. Mobley," (emphasis added) and the proceedings that actually mention most of the procedural and psychological history that is interesting here took place under "Turpin v Mobley." So the proposed name most-closely matches the appeals related to the initial, abandoned prosecution, not the cases of most interest. --Eggishorn(talk)(contrib)13:44, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
