This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
The Boston Globe recognition of Kaplan in its list of "25 Most Stylish Bostonians of 2010" seems rather trivial, should it stay? I think not, but would like to hear some other opinions. --CliffC (talk)
I think not. I'm not sure of the "being cool" recognition either. Personally, I wish the SPA creating these articles would read, review, and come to an understanding of the policies and guidelines for writing articles on Wikipedia. It gets tiring cleaning up her work because she can't take the time to learn or communicate with others. This is a collaborative project and they refuse to collaborate. Ugh. Cind.amuse23:31, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, I don't remember what is said in that particular article. Being amazing is rather subjective, as is being cool or stylish. But I think this is a fault of the magazine editors approving an article and providing a title that easily attracts "voyeuristic" readers at the expense of serious journalism. I think we need to review the magazine articles and the WP article content based on the magazine content. Does that make sense? Somehow, I think I'm going around in circles. Cind.amuse00:21, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
These things are like Time's "Person of the Year" on a much smaller scale. They're worth including if they're not too small-potatoes, I think. I hadn't heard of any of them. I can't even find anything about the amazing young women on glamour.com. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 00:29, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I propose that this page and the pages of the other founders be merged into the page for Her Campus as the founds are not notable individually and have shared their awards and recognition as part of their work on Her Campus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.116.234 (talk) 21:22, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]