Talk:Steph Stokes

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Emmerdale task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Unsourced returns claim removed

There is no source for the claims that Steph will return them, and as that section of the article described in great detail an episode that has yet to air, I can only assume it's someone making up stories. I've removed the section. Smurfmeister (talk) 11:16, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Steph Forsythe vs Steph Stokes

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Page moved per WP:COMMONNAME

I am proposing that this article be moved to Steph Stokes because it is her WP:COMMONNAME. This article appears to have been moved because of the classic "this character got married lets reflect that in the title" scenario. Steph Forsythe is not how this character is remembered - for instance the news of her return in which she is referred to as Stokes.Rain the 1 12:06, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article should be Steph Stokes. As you pointed out it's her WP:COMMONNAME and the article was clearly moved because of her marriage, which isn't a good enough reason. Her major storylines occurred while she was called Stokes and she was married for a year/less than a year. I think the Google/news hits would be higher for Stokes and, as you said, her return announcement calls her Steph Stokes. - JuneGloom Talk 16:26, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.