Talk:Stella power stations/GA1

GA Review

The article appears to be of the correct standard for GA, but there are some referencing problems:

Ref 11 is a garbled version of this file - [1] which is a copyrighted article only available to those who agree to the terms and conditions of use [2]. Ref 11 is therefore not a valid reference in its current form. If it is intended to use this as a reference then it should be quoted as a journal reference, e.g. of the form: (n/a) (1954). "Presidential Address", In: The Structural Engineer, Vol 32 (No. 1), Pp 1 to 10. (1 January 1954). Where "1 to 10" is replaced by the correct page numbers.
Ref 12 appears to be invalid; and it is not clear what is being cited. North East Tonight appears to be a television programme. So presumably a news item was either copied onto VHS by a viewer - in which case the date and time of the broadcast should be given; or Tyne Tees Television released a video tape about the power station, in which case the reference should be of the type represented by ref 15.
The two subsections "Closure" and "Demolition" are unreferenced.
The "Ash removal" section has little in the way of WP:verify.

I suspect that the link to Values in the "Cooling system" may be a typo and that possibly "valves" was intended?Pyrotec (talk) 20:15, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail: