Talk:Steel Dragon 2000
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Anything over 300 feet is "officially" a gigacoaster according to whom? It is an arbitrary designation. Morgan could call it a kiddie coaster and it still wouldn't mean anything.
About Criticism
[edit]Is this really needed? Very few people that have actually ridden the coaster in the Enthusiast Community have complained or even attempted to compare it to MF. Sounds like Cedar Point bias almost, the way it was written.
- I agree, this is too biased. Calling the turnaround on Steel Dragon 2000 a simple helix is quite an understatement, and the support for another company (Intamin) certainly violates NPOV.
dj_ansi 07:06, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
This article is sadly neglected
[edit]This is the longest coaster in the world, and the tallest gigacoaster in the world (beating Millennium Force, and yet the article is tiny. I think the assessment is off too: I'd rate its class as Stub, and its importance as High. Comments? --Skylights76 (talk) 22:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- After taking another look at this, it's obvious that my first impression was correct, so I went ahead and changed the assessment to stub/high. --Skylights76 (talk) 04:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
- ahoj jak se máte 31.47.98.209 (talk) 20:01, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class amusement park articles
- Mid-importance amusement park articles
- Stub-Class roller coaster articles
- High-importance roller coaster articles
- WikiProject Roller Coasters articles and lists
- Amusement park articles
- Stub-Class Japan-related articles
- Low-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles