Talk:Steadman (band)
 | This page was proposed for deletion by StartGrammarTime (talk · contribs) on 13 August 2024. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Comments
[edit]All of the external links on this article are dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.123.35 (talk) 01:36, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Requested move 15 September 2015
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed. Jenks24 (talk) 10:50, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
– I don't think the band is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, because it'd have to be more notable than everyone at Steadman (name) and that's simply not the case. -- Tavix (talk) 01:50, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- But no one listed at Steadman (name) is called simply "Steadman". There don't appear to be any other entities with articles at Wikipedia called "Steadman". See WP:PTM. — AjaxSmack 02:41, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Steadman (name) is a WP:SIA about the name. I'm saying that the name article is just as prominent (or more prominent) than the band, which is why the DAB should be at "Steadman." That has nothing to do with partial title matches. -- Tavix (talk) 03:08, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Let me put it another way. Who do you propose is going to search for any of the people at the Steadman (name) article with simply "Steadman" and is that number significant enough to outweigh users seeking the band? The name "article" is not even an article; it's two uncited sentences. — AjaxSmack 04:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Who do you propose is going to search for a barely notable British indie rock band from over a decade ago that had no label, no charting material, or anything else that would give them any ounce of prominence? It works both ways. -- Tavix (talk) 04:41, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- I don't know and I didn't oppose the move. I was just wondering if there was any reason for the move other than "I don't think..." — AjaxSmack 21:35, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Who do you propose is going to search for a barely notable British indie rock band from over a decade ago that had no label, no charting material, or anything else that would give them any ounce of prominence? It works both ways. -- Tavix (talk) 04:41, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Let me put it another way. Who do you propose is going to search for any of the people at the Steadman (name) article with simply "Steadman" and is that number significant enough to outweigh users seeking the band? The name "article" is not even an article; it's two uncited sentences. — AjaxSmack 04:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Steadman (name) is a WP:SIA about the name. I'm saying that the name article is just as prominent (or more prominent) than the band, which is why the DAB should be at "Steadman." That has nothing to do with partial title matches. -- Tavix (talk) 03:08, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support Steadman (surname) is at least as likely as Steadman (band). In ictu oculi (talk) 17:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
"The Dharmas" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect The Dharmas has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 29 § The Dharmas until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)