Talk:Stay LDS / Mormon

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stay LDS / Mormon article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Latter Day Saint movement Low‑importance

	Latter Day Saint movement portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Blogging (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging articles

Internet culture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

NPOV

I chose the NPOV tag rather than the {{advert}} tag; either one would work. The article is straying further from the neutral point of view that Wikipedia articles should strive for. tedder (talk) 16:55, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The tag is very cool if it attracts interested editors. The only sentence that is conceivably not straightforward, observable and verifiable fact, I imagine, is the third-and-last one:

The site's individual bloggers and visitors share their own experiences as a means of providing support to others of an informal, pastoral nature.

I have posted a couple of notices for help (for example, at the LDS project talk page). Thanks! ^{:^)} ↜Just M E here , now 17:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are right- the two things that caught my eye were the "type of site" sentence in the infobox and the "providing support of an informal, pastoral nature" sentence that you saw.

We both have biases- I make it clear on my user page that I'm atheist. That's perfectly okay, though. I'd rewrite this article if I had the ability to do so. It isn't bad, it just shouldn't promote the entity. tedder (talk) 18:27, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just went through it quickly. Comments? Between what the three of us (tedder, JHN, John Carter) have done, I think it looks much better. My only other complaint (not related to the tag) is the excessive seealso list. As WP:SEEALSO says, "A reasonable number of relevant links that would be in the body of a hypothetical "perfect article" are suitable to add to the "See also" appendix of a less developed one." I think a dozen wikilinks may be excessive- somewhere in the range of four seems more suitable. tedder (talk) 19:12, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I cut the external links to Bloggernacle, the fellow middle-way community (to Dehlin's) New Order Mormon, an LDS apologetics online community (FAIR blog), and the two disaffected LDS online communities. ↜Just M E here , now 19:40, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great work. It was fun to collaborate and improve this so quickly. tedder (talk) 19:43, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]