Talk:Staubbach Falls

Switzerland Mid‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rivers: Waterfalls Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Waterfalls task force.

Photos

There are a lot of good photos of the falls on Wikimedia Commons. I just added one, but it's not necessarily the best.

Ken (talk) 02:26, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 December 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved back to the long-term stable title per consensus here. — Amakuru (talk) 10:50, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Staubbach Fall → Staubbach Falls – The spelling "Staubbach Falls" appears to be over three times more common in English sources (2860 hits to 868 hits on Google Books) and was the original name of this article. It may have been moved because its German name is singular but, in English, we commonly use "Falls" or "Waterfall", rarely "Fall". An acceptable alternative would be "Staubbach Waterfall", but this only has 887 hits on Google books, about the same as "Fall". Bermicourt (talk) 08:23, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose The plural in English is, in this case, simply a wrong translation. Even in English there is a distinction between the singular and the plural. It is not arbitrary. There are numerous examples. Just the undereducated erronously thinks that the plural is generally valid just because the vast majority of waterfalls is plural. Merriam-webster: "Waterfall: a perpendicular or very steep descent of the water of a stream". -- ZH8000 (talk) 14:03, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I'm afraid Wikipedia uses WP:COMMONNAME, whatever we might think the right translation is. For example, the well known German football team is Bayern Munich in English, even though a strict translation would be "Bavaria Munich". In any case, "fall" is not correct English; it's either "waterfall" or "falls". See the Cambridge Dictionary here. Also see List of waterfalls of the United Kingdom or List of waterfalls of the United States - it's always "Xxxx Falls". --Bermicourt (talk) 14:35, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment (Even) J.M.W. Turner already knew the difference. Otherwise he would not have been called the upper, by far largest, and single fall of the Reichenbach Falls "The Great Fall of the Reichenbach", correctly in singular. An educated person, indeed. -- ZH8000 (talk) 14:45, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - Comment. You mean the subject of The Shadow of Reichenbach Falls by J.R. King (2011)? A different waterfall? We can trade individual sources for ever; the fact is that "Fall" is rarely used. Even Wikipedia:WikiProject Waterfalls#Naming makes that clear. --Bermicourt (talk) 18:05, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. (This could have been moved back as a revert of a recent undiscussed move.) This seems like a replay of the RM at Talk:Reichenbach Falls, which closed just a few days before the same editor made this move. Station1 (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Clearly the WP:COMMONNAME in English.--Cúchullain ^t/c 15:44, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.