Talk:Statutory boards of the Singapore Government

Lists Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Singapore Mid‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

I'm confused, is Public Utilities Board a statutory board or a corporate company. Since it uses .gov.sg domain, I think this is a statutory board. Could someone clarify this and cleanup the misunderstanding here? Thanks. --Ter e nc e Ong 09:40, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is a statutory board. --Sengkang 10:54, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Singov top 02.gif

The image Image:Singov top 02.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:02, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List or no list

Shouldn't this be a list? \ G.E.6.M.0.9.^{[[ see ]] ~ [[ talk ]] ~ [[ sign ]]} 08:43, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]