This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
I had initiated a merger process, but an anonymous editor undid my edit because he/she disagreed with my move. I think the need for merge is obvious ("individual editors can be bold and simply do it") because the subsections of the main page (Hungarian nobility) did not contain a word for the post-WW2 period. I still maintain that this page has to be merged with the article of "Hungarian nobility". We need to find a solution because text is duplicated now (I have already copied the text to the main page). Fakirbakir (talk) 10:03, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, main page should contain prose text, not just about the abolition law itself but nobility's confiscation of property, role in emigration, deportation to countryside, exclusion from higher education and politics, imprisonment and collective guilt ("B list"), foreign assimilation and so on. After 1990, foregone compensation, individual successes etc. 1947 law is only a part of that complex and extensive process, so a well-written separate article is well founded. If the main page's concerned section is empty, you should expand it, but not with merging of existing articles as you did. Because this text is about the law and its after-life and withdrawal attempts, and not about Hungarian nobility. --62.165.251.81 (talk) 09:21, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
