The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that when the statue Bishop John Carroll(pictured) was unveiled in 1912, a plaster cast version was secretly used instead?
Statue of John Carroll is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
@Another Believer: Can you explain your motivation? I'm generally inclined to think that it's preferable to use the actual name of an artwork and disambiguate if necessary rather than use a contrivance. Ergo Sum14:57, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Another Believer: I've re-checked the sources and don't find any specific mention of the statute's name in the form of Bishop John Carroll. I wouldn't oppose your renaming of the article, although I think, given that the Smithsonian says the official name of the artwork is Bishop John Caroll, it would make more sense to name the article "Statue of Bishop John Carroll" (rather than simply "Statue of John Carroll"). However, I'd defer to the outcome of the ongoing discussion. Ergo Sum15:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The proposed text about "Statue of..." being the preferred style for public statues has now been added to WP:VAMOS, but the policy doesn't cover whether it should be "...John Carroll", "...Bishop John Carroll" or "...Archbishop (John) Carroll". I wouldn't take the Smithsonian's choices as gospel; they mis-spelled the subject's name for this statue. "Bishop" seems odd given that he held a higher position and the statue is posthumous, and neither "Bishop" nor "Archbishop" appears on the pedestal, so my preference is for Statue of John Carroll. Ham II (talk) 18:33, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]