Talk:Starkiller (Star Wars: The Force Unleashed)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Subzerosmokerain (talk) 23:31, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

Wow i'm impressed by the article as a whole, I wish I could help improve it but I see few necessary improvements for GA. However, I will make some commentary on references.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
References 9, 11, 28 have GameSpot wikilinked, overlinking I believe. 6, 7, 22, 26, 30, 31, 34, 35, 41, 42 all have IGN wikilinked, also overlink. 36, 38-40 are also overlinked with GameDaily. Ref 43 and 44 have Game Informer wikilinked, pick one also italicize Game Informer in ref 44. Refs 3, 4, 33, 39 have UGO all wikilinked, plus 4 is only UGO, change it to UGO Networks. 2and 5 do not have StarWars.com italicized, italicize. Unwikilink Gamesradar in ref 45. Unwikilink Joystiq in ref 27.
Done Harry Blue5 (talk) 23:54, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Send me a message on my talk when you've finished Alrighty then, this article is GA. Impressive work. I need to get some tips from you for reference finding.