Jump to content

Talk:Star Wars: The Force Unleashed II/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 09:38, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    "The Nintendo handheld is designed around allowing players to quickly get into or out of the game.[9]" - I am confused about the "about"
    ? reworded, see if it's clearer --Teancum (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    What is "Slave I"?
    Green tickY reworded --Teancum (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Who are Ewoks?
    Green tickY linked --Teancum (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Many links missing in this section (Chewbacca, Han Solo, etc)
    ? linked to these characters, but I would need to know specifics as to what else needs wikilinked. --Teancum (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Ref 68 does not lead to any site
    ? There is no site to follow. Nintendo Power is a print-only magazine and I don't have access to the issue. --Teancum (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    In any event, that particular bit can be seen on Metacritic. I can replace it with an online source, if you want. —DAP388 (talk) 18:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    The concern is that it states December as against October 22. Were there multiple reviews of Nintedo Power? It would be nice if you would replace it, DAP.--GoPTCN 08:44, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Use pp only for several pages
    Green tickY fixed --Teancum (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Inconsistent date style
    Green tickY fixed --Teancum (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall: These issues hinder the article's promotion to GA status--GoPTCN 15:28, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Pass/Fail:
  • If you want to take this to FAC in future: Prose needs to be simplified a bit for our general users, plot needs to be expanded if possible (I know it is remarked that the story is rather short and boring), the references should be high-quality, as the reviewers there are very nitpicky (for example, try remove the redundant references)--GoPTCN 16:30, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]