Jump to content

Talk:Star Trek V: The Final Frontier/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 20:26, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


Can't really say I've ever been a fan of Star Trek, but I do love William Shatner.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    Prose style is impeccable, MOS is adhered to as well.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
    References are well-made, well-sourced and everything is supported.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
    Scope is grand, not too broad or too narrow.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Neutrality is fine.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    History is stable and uncontroversial.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Images are fine, all but the poster are free, and its fair use checks out.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    A very straightforward pass for this one - GA status might even be beneath it.