Talk:Star Trek: Of Gods and Men

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 December 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

Star Trek Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Harry Kim?

How could this character could be in that series??

Answer: He's not. The producers have said the actor is playing an all new character. However because Garet(sp?) Wang said in an interview that Harry Kim would be a bad ass, an obvious slip up, people still seem to be persistant that Harry Kim will be featured.

Trailer description

Do we really need a play-by-play description of the trailer? We already have the link to the video on Youtube. Quase 13:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, because some people have a really slow dial up connection. Either way. whats the big deal with it.. its better to have more information than no information

Type of Release?

The article on startrek.com filed as principle shooting had begun back in 2006 said that the mini-series would be a web-download distribution. Has that changed? emesselt 03:04, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hoax

I'm beginning to think that movie is a hoax, and the article should be put on deletion once again, unless there are substantial prooves that movie is in production.

Souris2005 18:33, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is not a hoax from the official website and good sources. It *may* turn out to be the movie equivalent of vaporware, but that doesn't make it a hoax. JRP 18:42, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Official website of what? it could be invented, that is the definition of a hoax, a credible invention.Souris2005 18:54, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple press reports, plus an official announcement from StarTrek.com itself. Sounds credible to me. Delays would not be an uncommon notion given the fact that it is financed from outside of the standard motion picture financing avenues. --Mhking 19:03, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The downloadable trailers, clearly starring recognisable lead actors from Star Trek series, and with evident expense and effort on special effects, are substantial evidence. Fayenatic london (talk) 19:18, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources_of_questionable_reliability

They created the trailer, there is no proof they created a movie. And look at the press reports! Star trek bla bla bla... I like Star Trek! But I need more prooves than those things! They are 5 months late! Just assume there is nothing more than a trailer!

It seems obvious to me that whoever financed this project has decided to try and recoup some of the money through a deal with CBS. As long as that possibility is alive, they will not release it for free, since that would hurt the potential profits. Once CBS settles on a cut acceptable to themselves and the producers, we will see a DVD, otherwise we will have to wait until negotiations fail for an internet release. The delays are not a sign of trouble, rather they indicate that the quality is good enough that they think they can sell it instead of giving it away. —MJBurrage • TALK • 10:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ohhhh... It wasn't a hoax after all... but... took too much time for what i've seen until now... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Souris2005 (talk • contribs) 03:29, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Example actors used

In the main text of the article, In the 'other trek veterans playing new roles' but, I would say that Cirroc Lofton and JG Hertzgler (sp?) are significantly more notable than the two there and should be used instead.Isaac Benaron 02:54, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea.

Done The original list in the article came from the press release. - Fayenatic london (talk) 11:26, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Budget?

Have figures been released revealing the cost of this project? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.174.247.185 (talk) 00:06, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Star Trek: Of Gods and Men. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:29, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Official Site takeover

The official site now redirects to random sites, including one that tries to install malware.

Plot too long

The page has been tagged since 2014 for having a verbose plot section. I started to trim it down but won't continue if there are objections. castorbailey (talk) 13:07, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]