Jump to content

Talk:Stanisław Poniatowski (1676–1762)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DCI2026 (talk · contribs) 20:20, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will review on a section-by-section basis for content quality as per GA standards. A preliminary checklist will be placed at the bottom when I'm done (hopefully, by Fri., Oct. 18. dci | TALK 20:20, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]
  • A longer lead with more personal information, less on each office he held, and a little more on his overall impact on Polish-Lithuanian history would be helpful for this article. dci | TALK 20:20, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit notice

[edit]

I will be copyediting the other sections today and will complete the review between tonight and tomorrow. dci | TALK 20:20, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pass

[edit]

I'm inclined to pass the article; I'll have a checklist up by tomorrow. dci | TALK 00:47, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

This article has passed its GA review.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    The article is well-written, though it would be wise to keep an eye out for grammar and usage in some cases.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    No problems whatsoever in this regard.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    The article is reasonably broad, while remaining appropriate in its biographical coverage.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    No problems whatsoever here.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Again, not even an issue.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    All appears well in regard to pictures and related copyrights.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    A well-written article. I would double-check in some areas for grammar and usage consistency. My sincere apologies for the inappropriate delay. dci | TALK 02:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]