Talk:Stanisław Poniatowski (1676–1762)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: DCI2026 (talk · contribs) 20:20, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
I will review on a section-by-section basis for content quality as per GA standards. A preliminary checklist will be placed at the bottom when I'm done (hopefully, by Fri., Oct. 18. dci | TALK 20:20, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Lead
[edit]- A copyedit is needed here. The sentences are rather choppy, and a check for correct capitalization is needed (e.g. Familia). dci | TALK 20:20, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
- A longer lead with more personal information, less on each office he held, and a little more on his overall impact on Polish-Lithuanian history would be helpful for this article. dci | TALK 20:20, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
- I've done some c/e to lead. I don't think anything in the position should be cut, and I also don't see what is missing - but you are welcome to make more specific suggestions, or edit the lead yourself. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:11, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Copyedit notice
[edit]I will be copyediting the other sections today and will complete the review between tonight and tomorrow. dci | TALK 20:20, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
- The process is taking a bit long; I have extended the c/e to the remaining sections. dci | TALK 02:48, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Pass
[edit]I'm inclined to pass the article; I'll have a checklist up by tomorrow. dci | TALK 00:47, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
- My apologies, this evening. dci | TALK 22:46, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- Take your time, I am in no hurry :) Thrice the charm? :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 19:21, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
- I suppose so. dci | TALK 19:21, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
- I'll give it another couple days, and if it's not completed I'll do the review. It's not that long an article, no reason for such a delay. Wizardman 23:08, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- I suppose so. dci | TALK 19:21, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
- Take your time, I am in no hurry :) Thrice the charm? :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 19:21, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Checklist
[edit]This article has passed its GA review.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- No problems whatsoever in this regard.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- The article is reasonably broad, while remaining appropriate in its biographical coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- No problems whatsoever here.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Again, not even an issue.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- All appears well in regard to pictures and related copyrights.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- A well-written article. I would double-check in some areas for grammar and usage consistency. My sincere apologies for the inappropriate delay. dci | TALK 02:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: