Talk:Stanene

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 December 2013. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Materials, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Materials on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaterialsWikipedia:WikiProject MaterialsTemplate:WikiProject MaterialsMaterials articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Electrical engineering

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electrical engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electrical engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Electrical engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Electrical engineeringelectrical engineering articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Name

The following is the source of the name "Stanene": • Sbmeirow • Talk • 21:10, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Too soon...

A single theory PRL is pretty weak sourcing for a stand alone article. I would suggest we wait until someone actually manages to grow a film... a13ean (talk) 05:18, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would note that all other sources are either reprints or closely based on the press release. a13ean (talk) 19:43, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. It's convenient to gather all info/speculation on stanene in one place rather than bury it in multiple other articles such as tin or topological insulators. Rod57 (talk) 23:20, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Even Scientific American noted it : "Could Atomically Thin Tin Transform Electronics? " - Rod57 (talk) 23:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]