Talk:Standing ovation

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsTemplate:WikiProject ArtsWikiProject Arts articles

Untitled

Refusal to stand during an ovation at a State of the Union Address is not so much an "insult," but it is widely interpreted to signal a legislator's disapproval of a specific policy statement. For instance, if a president calls for a national health insurance agency - one can measure support or opposition by comparing those who stand to those who remain seated. Also, by convention, non-partisan officials (Supreme Court justices, military officers) do not applaud during overtly political statements during the addresss. 72.191.191.73 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:09, 11 August 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Canadian Sports Emphasis?

Not anything necessarily wrong with the article, but it's odd that 1/2 of the entire page on "standing ovations" consists of examples from solely two sports teams within Canada. While they are perfectly legitimate, it seems to me like a very oddly Canadian sports-centric examples, given that this is a nearly universal gesture across the world. DougDommadome (talk) 07:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]