Talk:Standalone software

Untitled

I'm looking for the correct terminology that describes software that doesn't require "installation" to the operating system. For example there are some pieces of software that you can simply copy into a folder and run it, and you can even move said folder around without negatively impacting the functionality of the software (or in a more extreme case, if the software resides on the extended partition of a drive, the operating system itself can be wiped and re-installed without affecting the usability of the software). This is in contrast to software that depends heavily on system integration, such as a shell extension which would be essentially useless if the operating system was not directly made aware of a change in path or if the operating system itself was replaced. It seems like this might be another usage for the term stand-alone but I don't know if there is a better word for it.24.6.99.30 00:26, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is dangerous when some writers attempt to reinvent the wheel, so to speak, by allowing a change to definitions to occur over time. This usually occurs because of sloppy thinking and lack of knowledge, and contributes to the confusion over the terminology.

After over twenty-five years working within the computer industry, I can attest to the fact that stand-alone software is indeed software which does not have any other dependencies then what it contains within its own directory. Programs that install a DLL within the Windows system directory, or one that places something somewhere within the Linux /etc directory or other such scenario, may still be considered as basically stand-alone, as long as the reason for placing the additional files in other locations is to properly integrate with the backbone of the operating system (OS) itself. This is often because of a requirement of the OS rather than for any other reason. At the end of the day, the program must run on an OS, so that is not usually a part of the definition.

Programs which require the existence of other environmental components beyond those supplied directly by the OS, are definately not stand-alone programs. - KitchM (talk) 01:31, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tiny question

What is the term for the opposite of stand alone?? This would make it esier to search for software that is non-standalone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.92.112.234 (talk) 16:46, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose that one might say "dependent" or "incomplete" or even "environment-specific" software, but I can't image why anyone would want to find those or prefer them over stand-alone. Anything interrelated to other programs are more likely to cause problems or to experience them. - KitchM (talk) 03:37, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]