Talk:Stan Zemanek

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Australia: Television Low‑importance

	Australia portal Stan Zemanek is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

POV Argument

"While popular with much of his audience, he is vehemently unpopular with a large section of the population. This was exhibited most clearly when he, along with fellow talkback radio hosts Alan Jones and John Laws were mentioned unfavourably in the song "77%" by Sydney Hip Hop group The Herd.

"Talkback? Squawking hacks - won't relax until Jonesy, Zemanek and Laws are all axed."

I changed this paragraph which suggests he is 'vehemently unpopular' with a 'large section' of the population, being "exhibited most clearly" by little known band, The Herd, to Stan's own argument about being the most hated broadcaster in the country, and his own admissions of a strong right wing opinions. I don't believe there is a NPOV issue in the final paragraph unless someone wants to edit the bit about being right wing which was mentioned earlier in the article. Mike2680 08:40, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stupidity

Why is the fact that Stan had cancer a part of trivia?

Fair use rationale for Image:Chairman stan.jpg

Image:Chairman stan.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:17, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

It seems that IP:210.49.249.210 and User: YourBiggestFan are having a bit of fun vandalising the article. Please watch out for these two individuals (probably one person). Harrison-HB4026 02:18, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I noted some vandalism to his place of birth which I corrected. Capitalistroadster 03:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Start classification

I have classified this article as a start due to its level of detail and organisation. Capitalistroadster 03:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Chaser

Why is something as arbitrary and poorly thought through as the The Chaser's War On Everything tasteless skit even mentioned in Zamanek's article (going as far as describing "the nature of the controversy"). I propose this rather short-sighted addition be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.107.215.254 (talk) 12:28, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree the section was not appropriate and removed it. Next time, feel free to be bold and remove it yourself, anyone is allowed to edit Wikipedia. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 12:38, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Stan Zemanek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070706222700/http://www.news.com.au:80/story/0,23599,22019375-2,00.html to http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22019375-2,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:20, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stan Zemanek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927074035/http://www.stanzemanek.com.au/2006/sz-2006-bio-page.shtml to http://www.stanzemanek.com.au/2006/sz-2006-bio-page.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]