Talk:Stamford railway station

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Lincolnshire Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Stamford (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Stamford, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.StamfordWikipedia:WikiProject StamfordTemplate:WikiProject StamfordStamford articles

Alterations for larger trains

Quick note primarily intended for myself but could be of interest to others. I'll be looking into this in more detail when I get chance. Network Rail wish to make alterations to the station to permit larger gauge freight trains to use the line. See http://www.southkesteven.gov.uk/Planning/ApplicationInformation.aspx?ID=S08/LB/7000 and http://www.railwayherald.co.uk/issues/RHUK/Issue139.pdf page 4. Adambro (talk) 22:45, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stamford on the ECML

I went to school in Stamford (now closed Priory boarding school in St Leonards) and I remember an art class where we were taken to sketch what our teacher said was meant to be the main East Coast line station building, but the line was rerouted through Peterborough because the Cecils changed their minds at the last minute. Looking at a map now, it's at the end of Water St... and Station Rd. Presumably the line would have crossed the Burleigh estate to the station, then crossed the river and run up Brownlow St. The building across the street from the "station" had "Midland Hotel" carved above its door.

Anyone know if this is true (and if I even remember the hotel inscription right)? — FIRE!^{in a crowded theatre...} 11:02, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replying rather late, I am afraid

Well it is true, and well-documented, that Opposition by the Cecil family prevented the route through Burghley park, and that Peterborough rather than Stamford became a railway megopolis. But I don't think any work ever started on the non-route. I think the building you are thinking of in Water Street was Stamford East railway station, the station for the Stamford and Essendine railway line. Stamford East was built in 1856 by William Hurst, for the Marquis of Exeter who had changed his mind about railways and built the Essendine link. :I've added a new photo of the frontage, but here are some:

The hotel was named for the GNR:

Route diagrams

I'm very impressed by the route diagrams but have two suggestions:

Why not make them separate templates like all the others? Then they could be categorised like the others.
The pale colours used for connecting routes are normally used for closed lines. On the top one the ECML and WCML are shown in the pale colour, but clicking the Legend link goes to a page that says they are closed! On the second one the essendine line is closed & is in the pale colour. I'd suggest standardising the use of colours.

--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 22:48, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stamford railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]