Talk:Stadion Poljud

Football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Croatia Mid‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Event Venues (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Event Venues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Event VenuesWikipedia:WikiProject Event VenuesTemplate:WikiProject Event VenuesEvent Venues articles

Athletics Low‑importance

	Sport of athletics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Capacity

There is a problem. Someone keeps editing this article and deleting the correct data on the capacity of the stands. Perhaps we should lock this. Ballota (talk) 00:18, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know it is "correct", since it is unreferenced? What's more, why do you think that the previous figure is incorrect, since it was at least referenced? GregorB (talk) 21:13, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Beacuse I found the info in an old arcitecture book, talking about every single stand and telling the exact number of seats. 35,000 is just a rounded number that is being used alot, but it's not correct. You can fint it even at Hajduk.hr homepage and many others, but it doesn't make ih right. I would love to give you a digital proof, but that book is old. All I can do is scan it. Ballota (talk) 23:25, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No need to scan it, just use e.g. {{cite book}} and fill out the parameters that you have. However: the article says the stadium's capacity changed, so, since this book is "old", does this number reflect the current capacity? GregorB (talk) 23:47, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stadion Poljud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.split2010cc.com/News/tabid/59/ID/38/language/en-GB/New-seating-boxes-in-Poljud-stadium-coming-soon.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:55, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]