Talk:Stade de Luxembourg
Appearance
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contoversy concerning the name - why delete it ?
[edit]What is the reason to constantly deleting the section about the naming controversy of the stadium ? There are enough quotes that confirm there was a huge controversy concerning the naming of the stadium. I also added your text about how the petition was rejected by the chamber of deputies! So why delete this text ?
Kind regards, Letzebuergerr
- As per Wikipedia:Criticism, there is no need for a controversy section, and it seems that by repeatedly trying to include one you are pushing an agenda, which is contrary to WP:NPOV. That there was any criticism of the name is made abundantly clear in the sentence: "In September 2020, the Luxembourg Chamber of Deputies rejected a petition to amend the name using the Luxembourgish language." Even that is probably overstating it, because as I gather the petition failed to get enough signatures. Just to give you an idea of how small a "controversy" it was, the official petition to change the name only gathered a total of 1,081 signatures out of the necessary 4,500 signatures required for a proper parliamentary debate. Luxofluxo (talk) 17:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:07, 4 January 2023 (UTC)