Talk:Stacy Offner

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Jewish Women

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish Women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish WomenTemplate:WikiProject Jewish WomenJewish Women articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies: Person

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
	This article is supported by the LGBTQ+ Person task force.

Women in Religion Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because the person has accomplished important firsts for women and lesbians. I will try to get more primary sources on her life. — Dante8 (talk) 19:38, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tend to agree with you. It has the makings of an interesting article. Whoever left the 'notability?' box on the article hasn't explained their problems with it, so I'll remove the box. However, the citations/references are a mess, I hope this is only because you don't know how to format citations (and not because you 'found something on the internet' and copypasted the URL). I've formatted the book (on Google books) as an example of better practise (presumably you've read the book?). Sionk (talk) 01:44, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Footnotes 1 and 9

First, I do think that this entry warrants inclusion for the same reasons outlined by Dante8.

Second, regarding footnotes 19 and 20 - this is tricky. Footnote 19 takes the reader to a text in which the rabbi herself makes the claim that she was fired from her position shortly after coming out to the board about her sexuality. Wikipedia: identifying reliable sources addresses some of the challenges of this source: in short, the text offers Rabbi Offner's version of the events that led to her dismissal. A third-party perspective would lend more credible credence to this assertion.

It is tricky because, at the very least, there seems to be a correlation between her addressing her sexuality and her dismissal, but to assert a direct cause-and-effect relationship would require a better source than just the rabbi's words, wouldn't it?

I'm not sure why footnote 20 is connected to this sentence. It's great information about the theological roots of Shir Tikvah's formation, but that's not what this sentence is addressing, is it? Crumbit (talk) 21:16, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I read through the footnotes re: the issues I raise above, and I stand corrected: footnote 9 works just fine as a reliable source. Crumbit (talk) 23:11, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]