Talk:St Peulan's Church, Llanbeulan/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 16:19, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: Fixed one dab. [1]. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 16:24, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Linkrot: no dead links, fixed on one accessdate.[2]. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 16:24, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- Good quality prose, follows MoS
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- References check out, sources appear reliable. Assume GF for off line sources
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Correctly licensed and tagged.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Well there is nothing wrong with this, so passing as GA status as it meets the criteria. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 16:37, 11 July 2010 (UTC)