Jump to content

Talk:St Mary Redcliffe/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tim riley (talk · contribs) 13:48, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


  • Overlinks
    • William II Canynges
    • stained glass
    • chancel (twice)
  • History
    • I'd link Perpendicular.
  • Architecture and fittings
    • Something has gone awry with the opening sentence. Removing the unwanted "the" before England would be a start, but it would still read oddly. I suggest something like, "St Mary Redcliffe is one of the largest parish churches in England, and according to some sources it is the largest of all."
    • "Lady Chapel" – capitalised here, but not in the earlier Architecture and fittings section. Most of the examples given in the OED capitalise Lady and about half of them also capitalise Chapel.
    • The last sentence of the second paragraph has an outbreak of capitalisation that doesn't match the style of the rest of the article.
  • The church bells
    • "Liverpool Cathedral" at first mention but "Liverpool Anglican Cathedral" at second mention. Better the other way round perhaps.
    • "Tenor" is sometimes capitalised and sometimes not. Not seems more sensible, as it isn't a name.
    • "semi-tone bells" – I know nothing of bell-ringing, but in music "semitone" is not hyphenated.
    • "diatonic" – could do with a blue link
  • Organists, choirmasters and directors of music
    • The opening sentence needs punctuating. A semicolon after "organists" would do.
    • It does seem somewhat disproportionate to list the organists and choirmasters but not the vicars. That said, the GA criteria do not require an article to be comprehensive, and this strange imbalance is therefore not a bar to promotion.
    • They are not full lists and only "significant" ones mentioned in the sources are included. A full list of vicars would be massive and I have not seen a full list anywhere I have read.— Rod talk 20:43, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing of great moment there. I look forward to cutting the ribbon when you have addressed these few points. – Tim riley talk 13:48, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have attempted to address most of your comments above, but couldn't work out "last sentence of the second paragraph". Could you take another look?— Rod talk 20:43, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not surprised you couldn't find them. I neglected to add a header. It is the second para of "Stained glass" to which I was trying to refer: Choir Aisles and North Transept (and West Window in the next para). So sorry for spreading confusion. Tim riley talk 20:53, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - hopefully got them now.— Rod talk 20:57, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good! All fine!

Overall summary

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Well referenced.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    Well referenced.
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    Well illustrated.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Well illustrated.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

A most enjoyable article, and a pleasure to review. Tim riley talk 21:07, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:St_Mary_Redcliffe/GA1&oldid=1137201222"