Talk:St James Park (Exeter)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the St James Park (Exeter) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Devon Mid‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football: England Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Event Venues (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Event Venues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Event VenuesWikipedia:WikiProject Event VenuesTemplate:WikiProject Event VenuesEvent Venues articles

Capacity

There seems to be some debate over the official capacity of St James Park. According to the groundskeeper on a non-official Exeter City message board ([1]) and Football Manager 2007 it is: 8,830. Please do not change the capacity back to 9,036 unless you have a sufficient source. Rowan Massey 15:10, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no move. DrKiernan (talk) 09:06, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

St James Park (Exeter) → St James Park — To undo a move done unilateraly, which has St James Park redirect to St James's Park, a place with a different name. Incoming links to St James Park overwhelmingly come to this page. — Pretty Green (talk) 12:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Oppose fix the incoming links, and then build a dab page, for this not overly rare name and its variants. That also goes for the London park, which would be moved for disambiguation redirection. 76.66.196.229 (talk) 06:22, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why? The names are different. It has worked up till now, what has changed? --Pretty Green (talk) 09:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support~~ I think we only have the two articles to disambiguate from here? We can fix it via a hatnote on each pointing to the other. --Narson ~ Talk • 17:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- St James Park (Exeter) , St. James's Park , St James' Park, Newcastle, and whatever else is around, but these three are up on WP:RM in some way right now 76.66.196.229 (talk) 02:46, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Not forgetting St. James's Park tube station & St James Park railway station 76.66.196.229 (talk) 03:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - Ah. A toughy then. Do we disambiguate when others could easily be confused with but arn't acctually the same as? Do we have any google hits to support St James in Exeter as primary? Is it possible to assertain that when the others arn't acctually spelt the same? Perhaps a disambig page here is the right option in a 'better safe than sorry' way. I'm kind of hoping the nominator will put forward some additional rational etc to deal with the quandry. For now striking my vote until I make up my mind. Narson'sPetFerret (talk) 08:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

First international fixture

I changed the part that said an England women's u21 game in Nov 2006 was the first international. This info's from the 1978 WFA Cup final programme which says a senior women's international against Ireland took place at SJP in May of that year. Clavdia chauchat (talk) 09:27, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]