Talk:St Giles' Fair

Winchester? Really?

I do not believe there is any relationship between the St. Giles Fair held in St Giles St, Oxford, in the aftermath of St Giles Day, and the fair on St Giles Hill near Winchester. I propose to remove all material making that claim (I have sources to the contrary).

This link says there was indeed a fair on St Giles Hill, into the mid 19th Century. Since the Oxford fair is attested since 13th Century, these two cannot possibly be the same fair. http://research.hgt.org.uk/item/st-giles-hill/

MrDemeanour (talk) 15:23, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so I had a go at removing this Winchester nonsense. The St Giles Fair in Oxford dates back to the consacration of St Giles Church (in Oxford), in about 1200. The Winchester fair was still running into the 19th century. But a lot of material in this article may have been added under the misapprehension that this is the same fair that used to run on St Giles Hill near Winchester; I can't unscramble that egg.

So, to be quite honest, I don't trust much of the detail in this article, because I don't know what parts were added by the Winchester editor. MrDemeanour (talk) 15:50, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on St Giles' Fair. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:50, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]