Jump to content

Talk:St George and Sutherland Shire Leader

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The newspaper is litter

[edit]

If you would like people to stop adding commentary about the newspaper's ineffective opt-out process and poor distribution practices, how about making sure the distributors follow the DSB's guidelines; and that your opt-out process actually works?

Or continue to pretend there's no problem littering our streets with paper that lies in place for weeks, and we'll keep writing to your advertisers and the council, EPA, MP, and ensuring your Wikipedia page correctly reflects your low standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.190.90.185 (talk) 02:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I recommend you read WP:NPOV and WP:NOR.
Wikipedia is an unbiased encyclopaedia. If a reliable source exists about distribution complaints, then they can be mentioned, without bias, in the article with a citation. Wikipedia is not the place for your personal views, which is why your edit has been removed.
Regards, Melodydove (talk) 05:47, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on St George and Sutherland Shire Leader. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:05, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]