Talk:St Dona's Church, Llanddona/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: ♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:57, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
This is an exemplary GA quality article which meets all of the GA criteria, short, but very well focused and written, the way an encyclopedia article should be. I would, however, like to see an image of inside the church or churchyard when it becomes available. It's not ready for FA yet, and I doubt it ever could be unless far more detail was found on it local library archives which provide valuable information on its history in earlier times or coverage in more books but you've used some ideal books and sources to help you write this which is more than enough for GA. Good job, I'm promoting this.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:04, 24 July 2011 (UTC)