Talk:St. Pete–Clearwater International Airport

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the airport project.

Tampa Bay (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tampa Bay, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Tampa BayWikipedia:WikiProject Tampa BayTemplate:WikiProject Tampa BayTampa Bay articles

Florida Mid‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

17R / 35L

What's the deal with runway 17R / 35L? It looks like it's basically a taxiway that was made into a very small runway as an afterthought. Does anybody have the story behind that? Vid the Kid (t/c) Yeah, that guy. 05:24, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's the parallel taxiway for runway 17L/35R and is also used as a daytime-only, VFR runway for light aircraft. JGHowes ^talk 02:11, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've now added a photo and elaborated some more about this in the "Current airfield and government facilities" section. JGHowes ^talk 04:26, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

German backstory?

No explanation is given in the article for the bilingual English/German signage in the airport. Personally, I always found that to be its most distinctive feature. Ought we not to address that? Carolynparrishfan (talk) 04:12, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]