Talk:St. Louis Bridge
Appearance
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1-
Photos of the bridge
[edit]Is this a photo of the bridge? I wonder because the date could be too old. The source is given "Illus. in: C.M. Woodward, A History of the St. Louis Bridge, 1881, frontis.". I've created a category on Commons, but haven't linked it to Wikidata yet. Wouterhagens (talk) 10:56, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use Canadian English
- Stub-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- Stub-Class Saskatchewan articles
- Low-importance Saskatchewan articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Stub-Class Bridge and Tunnel articles
- Low-importance Bridge and Tunnel articles
- WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels articles
- Stub-Class rail transport articles
- Low-importance rail transport articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages