Talk:Church of St. Elijah, Podujevë

Serbia High‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kosovo

	Church of St. Elijah, Podujevë is part of WikiProject Kosovo, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Kosovo on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.KosovoWikipedia:WikiProject KosovoTemplate:WikiProject KosovoKosovo articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cultural Heritage of Serbia (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cultural Heritage of Serbia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Cultural Heritage of SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject Cultural Heritage of SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject Cultural Heritage of SerbiaCultural Heritage of Serbia articles

Eastern Orthodoxy

	This article is part of WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the Eastern Orthodox Church. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You may also want to look at the current collaboration of the month or the project's notice board.Eastern OrthodoxyWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyTemplate:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyEastern Orthodoxy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

St. Andrew

"St. Andrew was shelled, a bell tower completely destroyed with explosives and the wall that surrounded the church was demolished."

St. Andrew is the alternative name of the church or what? Radu Gherasim (talk) 22:11, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This source (from the first revision): [1] there's a report of a St Andreas church being destroyed, with dates the same as this one. This ref about St. Elijah [2] has the year it was built as 1930 not 1929. I suspect the article has information about two churches.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 22:42, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is the same, as there are no other Orthodox church in Podujevo. It was built in 1929, and finished in 1930, as you can see above the entrance. And name is wrongly translated. It was translated also as Holy Apostle Andrej church, St. Andrew's church, and few more, but it is only Saint Elijah Church. --Tadija (talk) 11:53, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I guess then, the sentence must be modified with St. Elijah, right? Radu Gherasim (talk) 17:30, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Podujevo srusena crkva.JPG Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Podujevo srusena crkva.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Podujevo srusena crkva.JPG)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:34, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Podujevo church.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Podujevo church.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Podujevo church.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:56, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Serbian graveyard.JPG Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Serbian graveyard.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Serbian graveyard.JPG)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:56, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation

Category was reverted, as this church was attacked numerous times, with clear attacker desire to tear it down forever. That is terrorism, in very basic form, as Buddhas of Bamiyan. And restored clear redirect, that is not bad term, it is historically correct. Fascist Croatia is only one example... --WhiteWriter^speaks 22:05, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the church was attacked. But terrorism? That's Original research. bobrayner (talk) 12:02, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, that was "sky is blue" type of conclusion. And we have sources for that. Therefor, revert. Church was not attacked, but deliberately destroyed five times. --WhiteWriter^speaks 19:43, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Destruction is automatically terrorism? This must be a new definition of "terrorism" of which I was previously unaware. bobrayner (talk) 23:09, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, destruction is not, but this is. --WhiteWriter^speaks 23:10, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whitewriter either find some reliable sources that back up your claims that it constitutes terrorism (not a random Youtube video or your personal conclusions) or remove the category. By the way the majority of sources present in the article including orthodoxnews.net, serbianunity.net, and kosovo.net are not reliable sources. -- ◅PRODUCER _(TALK) 12:50, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Terrorism-article does point at this event being a "terrorist act" in the respect that it was during the March Pogrom, with clear motives, though the civilian ethnic Albanians could not be labeled "terrorists", the act is.--Zoupan 13:33, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a reference nor should we be engaging in original research. It isn't up to us to personally decide. Reliable sources do the talking. -- ◅PRODUCER _(TALK) 13:40, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a POV tag(kosovo.net etc.) and BK didn't even exist in 1941 so it couldn't be responsible for any alleged action.--— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 21:26, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:St. Achillius Church, Arilje which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:59, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Church of St. Elijah, Podujevo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:09, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]