This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
The article contained the frankly silly claim that this 10th-century church "It is the oldest church in continuous use in both Ireland and Great Britain." Of the 3 sources (all Irish) at the end of the para, only one, a tourism piece from the Irish Times, seems to contain anything relevant: "... is believed to be the oldest church in continuous use not only in Ireland but probably throughout these islands. The 10th-century structure dates from at least 964...", with nothing to say who believes it. Certainly not any specialists in Anglo-Saxon architecture! There are plenty of older parish churches in England - large parts of All Saints' Church, Brixworth date to the 7th century, and it remains a functional parish church, as does St Mary's Priory Church, Deerhurst (8th century) and Escomb Church (7th century). Then there's St Martin's Church, Canterbury, which goes back to 580, as a renovated Roman church, and is still in use. Even with a generous allowance for for patriotic embellishment, the IT article is not acceptable as a WP:RS on this. Johnbod (talk) 01:12, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
