Talk:St. Croix Boom Site

Minnesota Mid‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Additional pictures

These pictures might illustrate better.[1]--Appraiser 18:44, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources, and confusion on dates of rediscovery

Now showing as an External link is one National Park Service source, which might be the source for much of original writing of article. Probably it should be used as a footnote reference supporting the particular points it supports.

Also, I edited the article to include mention, from the NRHP text, that the original location of the site had been forgotten since the boom closed in early 1900s, then was rediscovered by 1975 National Park Service survey. However, the NHL was declared by the National Park Service in 1966, per several sources. Something doesn't make sense here. doncram (talk) 23:24, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Secondary sources aggressively misinterpreted what was "rediscovered" in 1975. The site was never forgotten, and has been marked since at least 1929. The NPS survey simply found two buildings long hidden by thick forest when it had been assumed that no structures remained from the log boom era. It's unclear what condition these buildings were in—whether they were actually still standing or just foundation remnants—and no indication of their status now 40 years later. -McGhiever (talk) 02:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]