Talk:St. Antony's Church, Pazhuvil

India: Kerala Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Low-importance).

Christianity: India Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Christianity in India (assessed as Low-importance).

Wikify

This article is for a church that is probably notable, so it should not be deleted. However, it needs to be expanded and tidied up. It needs to be flagged - there may be a better template than wikify to use, but I have repeated tried to add this and had it deleted by an IP that appears to be the page's creator. I have asked on the IP talk page and in my edit summary here for them to desist. What is best to do with this article? --Whouk (talk) 16:19, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey 60.35.185- it is standard to request such things for a page, wikify just means to add in links that will link to other pages. Would you be willing to stop undoing those edits? Sethie 16:40, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

I've fixed the typos, formatted, and added the little I could locate on the Internet. Durova 20:37, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this is Wikified now. The appropriate notice to add would be stub. Please remove this from the Request for Comment list. --LakeHMM 01:54, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]