Talk:Stéphane Courtois

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Controversy section

Stephane Courtois is a highly controversial historian. Not only for him every communist is a stalinian, but also, he considers anti-fascism or anti-racism as "dangerous". He has collaborated with far-right french revues ("choc du mois"; "nouvelle revue d'histoire"), and has brought his support to Gerard Chauvy, condemn to defamation for having implied that Raymond Aubrac had betrayed Jean Moulin. Raymond Aubrac and his wife are very famous figures of the french resistance. (86.210.8.173 (talk) 20:54, 21 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Do you have any references for that? If so you might be able to add that. World Views (talk) 22:46, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Atrociously written (or badly translated?)

Much of this entry is really poorly written, to the extent that it is in places very hard to tell what is actually meant. Quite possibly parts of it have been roughly translated from French. Consider this sentence, chosen pretty much at random: "The historian Henry Rousso (Vichy, a past that does not pass, 1996) criticized him for simplifying all militant or communist sympathizers as accomplices of the crimes of Stalinism and, by extension, considered all to be conditionally allied with communist forces or with the Soviets as blind accomplices of Stalin." I've had to read that several times to make sense of it. I suggest that a lot of this entry needs to be re-written wholesale.

The entry is also over-long in my opinion and padded out with a lot of unnecessary information (much of it, it seems, intended to support Courtois' own historiographical positions). How much information about Lenin's 1922 is really necessary in an article about an historian (even a controversial one)? On the other hand there are also places - such as the very short section on Gerard Chauvy - that are so lacking in information as to be confusing. Someone needs to attack this entry with both a hatchet and a scalpel, hacking out the great sections of unnecessary digressions and filling in the many points where more basic detail is clearly necessary. But above all, it needs to be translated into good, readable English. 122.58.178.203 (talk) 17:54, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@122.58.178.203 Apologies if bumping such an old talk page topic is discourteous, but it is rather odd to read this article in 2024 and see the exact same errors that this user cites. I agree that the article seems bloated like a blowfish in defense of Courtois' questionable research, though I recognize that my ignorance of the specific intellectual context prevents me from making the needed edits myself. Michlusky (talk) 13:28, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Stéphane Courtois. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:09, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]