Talk:Srimanthudu/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 14:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
I'll finish this one shortly JAGUAR 14:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Initial comments
[edit]- "and played the film's protagonist" - I feel that the protagonist's name should be mentioned here
- "and encouraged the adoption of village in Telangana and Andhra Pradesh" - should this either be a village or villages?
- "Harsha Vardhan is the sole heir of his father Ravikanth's business empire worth 250 billion" - no rupee symbol here?
- "A possible delay was expected as Mahesh had earlier agreed to work in a film" - on a film
- "All lyrics written by Ramajogayya Sastry, except where noted." - this sentence is unsourced
- " called a feat that India's then prime minister Narendra Modi 's" - isn't he the current prime minister?
Close - promoted
[edit]I couldn't find anything worthy of putting this on hold, so I can conclude that this article outright meets the GA criteria. Well done! I think this is your best one yet. It is comprehensive, well written and the references are also fine. I enjoyed reading this one JAGUAR 15:58, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review Jaguar! I've resolved all those comments you have listed. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)