Talk:Srikalahasti

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Srikalahasti article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India: Andhra Pradesh Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Andhra Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Copyvio

I have reverted text copied from the following websites,

[1]
[2]

- Ganeshbot 00:01, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SRIKALAHASTHI

File:Srikalahasti01.jpg

Provision Shop

I have no idea if the information on the provision shop is accurate. It was added by an IP, but it was only bad grammar not obvious vandalism. I cleaned up the text. Shadowin 06:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I delted it and it is spam. Mlpkr 23:13, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Kalahasti temple

I believe they should be merged and we do not need another page for temple.

Name of the place

It is horrible to hear or the name of the place as "kalahasti." it should always be "srikalahasti" as it derives from the names of the three animals, which have been given salvaltion at the place, namely spider, snake and an elephant.we cannot seperate an important constituent of the name of the town like that.it would state only two animals instead of three, and we cannot ignore the very first part of the name,and animal. official name is "srikalahasti," and it has to be. native, unlearned and lazy people have been using it as "kalahasti." i think you better understand by this example; it should be called "new york," calling "york" certainly would be impropable. i think you notice it, and hope you will not entertain it again. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.65.134.34 (talk) 12:00, 18 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

ok, changed the name to Srikalahasti in entire article. Mentioned the informal name only in the leadin section as alternative name, otherwise search engines will not find it. mlpkr 02:44, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup of recent changes

The article needs to follow the guidelines of WP:INCITIES. I rephrased newly added sentences without loosing information and removing personal opinions like( kalahasti is no exception). I also did not understand why parliment constituency information is removed and so I brought it back. "See also" gives details of other related articles. Festivlas should be part of culture and so I moved them there. Listing movie theatre names brings lot more names that do not add value to article, so I simply mentioned their presence. mlpkr 02:35, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion

I am trying to expand the article according the to the above guidelines. I request peer reviews from the other participants. I have already added some content in Education section. Have a look at it.My aim is to see this article as a featured one. --రవిచంద్ర (talk) 07:07, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Srikalahasti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]