Talk:Sridevi: The Eternal Screen Goddess

Sridevi: The Eternal Screen Goddess has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 16, 2022	Good article nominee	Listed

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sridevi: The Eternal Screen Goddess/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: PinkElixir (talk · contribs) 13:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I can pick up this review. I'll have it done soon. Kind regards~ PinkElixir (talk) 13:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
The prose, spelling, and grammar is of acceptable quality. I made some wording edits (mostly fixing grammar) while conducting the review. The article generally follows MoS for word choice, lead, layout, etc.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
The article has both a References and Sources section, both of which contain WP:RS. URL's to sources lead to reliable news sources.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
The article covers an appropriate summary of the book, from Nayak's conception of the idea through the writing process and critical reception.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
The article follows WP:NPOV.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
There is no indication of edit wars in the edit history or on the article talk page.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
The image used is under a fair use license.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Apologies for the delay, but great work! Cheers~ PinkElixir (talk) 00:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]