Talk:Sri Lanka Premier League

Sri Lanka Mid‑importance

	Sri Lanka portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

‹ The template below (WikiProject Cricket) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

Cricket Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Cricket To-do list:

Article assessment

Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details

Verifiability

Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards

Cleanup

There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)

Infoboxes

Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes

Cricket people

Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list
Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class.
Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
Create articles for redlinks present here and here

Cricket teams & countries

Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe;
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams
Create articles about cricket in these missing countries
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI

Images

Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here

On this day in cricket

Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries

Umpires

Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel

Women

Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours

Update

A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains
Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.

Other

Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

Franchises section

SocietyBox I don't understand why you come to my talk page and give me an edit warring tag when I have neither edit warred nor have made unconstructive edits. The last edit I made was the first I made in weeks to this article so please show me Wikipedia guideline or rules that I am breaking. Also I have clearly written a summary of the reason for my edit, however each time you have reverted [1], [2], [3] all you have done is stated that you have reverted or restructured, but not why you have, and yet you still come to my talk page before even considering discussing it in this talk page. So I think your lack of an edit summary was a valid enough reason to allow me to undo your edit. You site aesthetics is not a priority. Could you please tell me why not and where it says that on Wikipedia? My edits dont disrupt the article as well as being aesthetically pleasing, so what is the issue you have here?

Just for those who don't know SocietyBox's edits leave a large white space in the middle of the article, while that can be fixed with my edit that has been reverted by him.

Thanks, I will be waiting for your reply.--Blackknight12 (talk) 04:11, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit was a full revert of the Franchises section from two weeks ago and undid constructive edits during this time. Your single stated reason was the section having a "large gap". Wikipedia:Don't throw out the baby with the bath water. By aesthetics not being a priority, I meant not being a priority over content (i.e. the constructive edits between the two-week period). SocietyBox (talk) 07:02, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please tell me exactly which constructive edits I undid? I reverted the whole thing because not only did it look untidy, with the large white gap, but you also removed sourced information. My edits did not affect content in any way, in fact I have been gradually improving it myself. The link you added yourself, Help:Whitespace, says that sometimes you have to reorganize things to fix this problem, hence my edit is fully backed by wiki guidelines. So I am still not sure what your issue is here????

In future I would appreciate it if you would not accuse me of anything I have not done. Eg. edit warring.--Blackknight12 (talk) 10:06, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:EDITWAR is defined as repeatedly overriding each other's contributions, rather than trying to resolve the disagreement by discussion. You, again, reverted the article before this discussion has been settled. You seem attached to a certain version of the article (see also: WP:OWN, WP:WIN) despite your version having poor structure, with text above and below the table, and poor readability with repeated and unsourced content. SocietyBox (talk) 23:33, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]