Talk:Sri Isopanisad

This subject has been dealt with in full detail under a different title Ishopanishad. So this page can be removed. If necessary the reference to AC Bhaktivedanta Swami can be incorporated in that page.

--Profvk 22:45, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the appropriate tags to both pages, but I know virtually nothing about this subject, so I'll leave it to a more knowledgeable person to take the appropriate actions. Cheers --Pak21 09:46, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A search for 'Sri Isopanisad' on Google gives 26,200 hits, whereas 'Isha isopanisad' gives only 383 and 'Ishopanishad' gives around 800 - thus I would say that the title Sri Isopanisad is far more suitable as a title to the page. Currently the other (Isha Upanishad) page has much more information on it, but I don't feel that it is very encyclopedic and reads more like a personal essay. I will try and work on this page and bring across whatever is relevant. GourangaUK 13:30, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the articles are on the same text, so obviously they have to be merged. Looking at Mukhya, you will note that we usually don't have the -o- of sandhi in article titles. "Sri" is just a honorific. I think Isha Upanishad is the proper title, but I agree that the article there is in a very bad state: it is basically a poor essay. We need to merge and clean up asap... dab (ᛏ) 12:14, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I got caught up half-way through - I agree they are the same subject. Best to work from a more solid basis in the merged article. GourangaUK 14:30, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]