Talk:Sri Ganganagar district

India: Districts / Rajasthan / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian districts (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rajasthan (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Jack Greenmaven, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on May 19, 2012.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

WP:INDIA Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 06:59, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sri, Shri, or both.

There is no inclusion of alternate names but an article Shri Ganganagar Junction railway station uses "Shri" in the links. There needs to be consistency per WP:TITLECON, for article titles, and MOS:ARTCON, for consistency within articles. Otr500 (talk) 18:38, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you find images of that railway station on google, you'd see "Sri Ganganagar". So I'd say the railway station article's title is incorrect, an honest mistake no doubt. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 04:44, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 4 May 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Please comment at Talk:List of districts in India#RM discussion — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:15, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Ganganagar District → Sri Ganganagar district – As per, WP:CONSISTENT. All other districts titles have small "d" lettercase for the word "district". Hemant Dabral^Talk 03:06, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Comment~~ Oppose and change all the lowercase districts of India to uppercase: I would think for all of these that the opposite would be the case—that all the lowercase "district" names should be capitalized. If this is its proper name, then in English it should be capitalized (like "New York State" or "Czech Republic"). If this is instead a general description (like "Great Lakes region") then it should be in lowercase. Compare for example all the articles under these categories: C:Districts of Bangladesh, C:Districts of Ghana, C:Districts of Azerbaijan, C:Districts of Brunei, C:Districts of Afghanistan, C:Districts of Cambodia, and many more—where "District" is always capitalized. Also, take a look at the discussion going on right now about "Seoul station". — the Man in Question (in question) 05:24, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose see Talk:List of districts in India#Outstanding RMs. Andrewa (talk) 03:07, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per usage in sources. Dicklyon (talk) 04:20, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of districts in India which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:45, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]