Talk:Squatting in Namibia

Squatting in Namibia has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 5, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Africa: Namibia

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Namibia (assessed as Low-importance).

Squatting Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Squatting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of squatting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SquattingWikipedia:WikiProject SquattingTemplate:WikiProject Squattingsquatting articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

WP:SQUAT

There are over one billion squatters worldwide and the phenomenon is under-represented on Wikipedia. Join Wikipedia:WikiProject_Squatting to help write articles about squatting in every country, or drop a message on the talkpage about something else you'd like to see covered. This is just one of many ways to counter systemic bias on Wikipedia! Mujinga (talk) 15:26, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Squatting in Namibia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 00:37, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, Mujinga! I will get to this within seven days. Please note that I am returning to GA reviewing after an hiatus, so please WP:TROUT me if I make a mistake. Thanks, ツ LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 00:37, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello hello - from tomorrow my internet access will be intermittent for a week but I should still be checking in. Looking forward to your comments, Mujinga (talk) 11:00, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noted! Feel free to take some time. :) ツ LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 17:34, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There we are; on hold for now. My comments are below. ツ LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 18:06, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for them, I've answered on everything - Mujinga (talk) 16:17, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome work! I am now very pleased to pass yet another great squatting-related article. Congrats! ツ LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 01:40, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

Earwig says good to go.

Files

Good to go; Cloudy heaven.jpg is on Commons under CC-BY SA 4.0; Slum u Swakopmundu - panoramio.jpg is on Commons under CC-BY SA 3.0; Informal settlement Freedom Square in Gobabis Namibia 1.jpg is on Commons under CC-BY SA 4.0.

Prose

In the lead, wikilink informal settlements.
done Mujinga (talk) 20:55, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"and thus the concept of squatting thus did not apply." – remove one of the thuses to avoid redundancy.
good spot! Mujinga (talk) 20:55, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"to do this was subsequently made illegal" – any idea when?
yes it was the Native Administrations Proclamation of 1922 - in mentioning that, I rejigged things a bit, I think it's better now, thanks for the inspiration! Mujinga (talk) 16:16, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That looks much better! ツ LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 01:40, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"ten bantustans were established, the remaining" – recommend "ten bantustans were established, and the remaining"
yes that's better Mujinga (talk) 15:32, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"one of the biggest goals" – suggest largest because it sounds slightly more formal IMO.
changed! Mujinga (talk) 15:32, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"so as to allow construction" – I believe it should be "so as to allow the construction" due to the highway being the singular subject.
i rephrased, hope it reads better now Mujinga (talk) 21:06, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"and 8,090 at Gobabis" – why not in like the other settlements?
it reads ok to me, but happy to change to "in" Mujinga (talk) 15:31, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, that is fine with me! ツ LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 01:40, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would rename § Legal to § Legality.
done Mujinga (talk) 15:31, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"saying it had not" – 'it' being?
it is the challenge, I've rejigged because it was garbled, no wonder it was confusing Mujinga (talk) 15:30, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

Passes spotcheck on refs 1, 3, 12 and 13.

Recommend a citation template for ref 3.
done Mujinga (talk) 15:28, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It seems The Namibian changed their URLs because all of their citations are dead; mark them as dead or if possible try to find and link their new URLs.
hmm yeah that's annoying - I've replaced the links except "Squatters bemoan empty election promises" which I've marked as dead Mujinga (talk) 15:28, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Noted. ツ LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 01:40, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.