Jump to content

Talk:Squallis Puppeteers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

M-BMor 11:03, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability?

[edit]

I've included an article from the Courier-Journal (i.e., "No Foolin', it's a puppet party"). They also appeared on KET's Mixed Media. Jordansc 03:34, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've included a photo I took for a feature back in 2004. They are "notable" enough. Ben Chroneos 16:54, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would help further if actual content were added to the article text to demonstrate why the Squallis Puppeteers are notable. It passed the AfD test, but it's still not much of an article at this time. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 20:31, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Squallis Puppeteers/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article is a stub -- not quite start. Low importnace ... i beleive based on what I see here -- they are notable locally but very low importance of notability.M-BMor 11:05, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 11:05, 22 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 06:46, 30 April 2016 (UTC)